Celestia Price
Celestia does one job and deliberately refuses the others. Most blockchains bundle four responsibilities together — running the transactions, settling disputes, agreeing on order, and publishing the underlying data so anyone can check the work. Celestia takes…
Marktdaten über Binance · Signale live aus den Tagesschlusskursen berechnet · keine Finanzberatung.
Wichtige Markterkenntnisse
Eine Einordnung in einfacher Sprache von Live-Indikatoren, die aus den Tagesschlusskursen berechnet werden — sie beschreiben das aktuelle Kursverhalten, keine Prognose.
Technische Analyse
Gleitende Durchschnitte, Momentum und Unterstützung/Widerstand aus den täglichen Schlusskursen — eine Momentaufnahme der aktuellen Struktur, keine Prognose.
Historische Wertentwicklung
52-Wochen-Hoch und -Tief mit rückblickenden Renditen über verschiedene Zeiträume. Berechnet aus bis zu 365 Tagesschlusskursen.
Automatisierte Beobachtungen
Mechanisch aus aktuellen Marktdaten erzeugt (Volatilität, Trend, Abstand zu den Höchstständen) — beschreibend, keine Empfehlung.
Stärken · Rückenwind
- Live price, market cap and supply all resolve cleanly from source data.
Risiken · Gegenwind
- Annualised volatility of 106% — large day-to-day swings.
- Price is below the 50-day average, which sits below the 200-day — a classic downtrend alignment.
- Trading 84% below its 52-week high — well off recent peaks.
Angebotsstruktur
Celestia hat kein festes maximales Angebot. Das zirkulierende Angebot ist eine kuratierte Schätzung, aus der die Marktkapitalisierung berechnet wird.
Celestia-Derivate
Live-Kennzahlen zu Perpetual Swaps. Das Funding ist die periodische Zahlung zwischen Long- und Short-Positionen; das Open Interest ist der Gesamtwert der ausstehenden Kontrakte. Rein informativ — keine Empfehlung, mit gehebelten Produkten zu handeln.
Quelle: Binance Futures · Funding wird pro 8 Std. und annualisiert angezeigt. Gehebelte Produkte bergen ein hohes Risiko; nur zu Informationszwecken.
Celestia in US-Dollar umrechnen
Umrechnung in beide Richtungen TIA ↔ USD zum Live-Kurs von Binance. Geben Sie in einem der beiden Felder einen Betrag ein oder tippen Sie auf einen voreingestellten Wert.
Über Celestia
Celestia does one job and deliberately refuses the others. Most blockchains bundle four responsibilities together — running the transactions, settling disputes, agreeing on order, and publishing the underlying data so anyone can check the work. Celestia takes only the last two. It orders data and guarantees it was genuinely published, and leaves execution to whoever builds on top. The term for this is a data availability layer, and it exists because publishing data is the part that gets expensive when everyone shares one chain.
The trick that makes it workable is sampling. Rather than every participant downloading every block to confirm nothing was withheld, light nodes each request a few small, randomly chosen pieces. If enough independent nodes get their pieces back, the odds that a meaningful chunk of the block is being hidden collapse. That means verification does not require expensive hardware, which is the whole point. TIA pays for the space where chains post their data and is staked by validators under <a href="/glossary/proof-of-stake/">proof of stake</a>, with delegation and slashing working as they do elsewhere.
The customers are chains, not end users. A team that wants its own <a href="/glossary/layer-2/">layer-2</a> or application-specific chain can use standard frameworks to spin one up and post its data to Celestia instead of building a validator set or paying for space on a congested general-purpose chain. That has made launching a chain far more of a routine engineering decision than it used to be.
The open questions are worth stating plainly. Celestia cannot execute smart contracts or arbitrate fraud, so anything built on it must supply its own answers for settlement and bridging — and those pieces are where the security of a rollup usually lives or dies. Sampling security assumes a healthy population of independent light nodes, which is an assumption, not a guarantee. Ethereum's own data space and rival availability layers compete for exactly the same customers. Rewards come from issuance, so holders who do not stake are diluted. Ultimately it is a wager that modular design wins — a live argument, not a settled one, and exactly the sort of thing our <a href="/learn/how-to-evaluate-a-crypto-project/">project evaluation guide</a> tells you to weigh first.
Celestia gegenüber Vergleichswerten
| Coin | Kurs | 24 Std. | Marktkapitalisierung |
|---|---|---|---|
| Celestia TIA | $0.3495 | +2.19% | $167.76M |
| BNB BNB | $573.19 | +0.39% | $80.25B |
| XRP XRP | $1.11 | +0.52% | $64.17B |
| Solana SOL | $76.69 | +2.23% | $36.43B |
| TRON TRX | $0.3309 | -0.42% | $28.66B |
| Monero XMR | $352.30 | -3.47% | $6.50B |
Celestia FAQ
What does 'data availability' really mean?
It means the data behind a block was actually published, so anyone who wants to check the chain's work can obtain it. If a block producer could publish results while withholding the underlying transactions, nobody could prove it had cheated. Availability is therefore the foundation under fraud proofs and independent verification — unglamorous, but the thing everything else quietly depends on.
Is Celestia a competitor to Ethereum?
Partly, and only in one narrow area. It competes for the data that rollups need to publish, which is also a service Ethereum now offers directly. It does not compete on smart contract execution or on settlement, and some chains use Celestia for data while still settling elsewhere. Describing it as an Ethereum replacement misses what it actually does.
What is TIA used for?
Two things mainly. Chains pay it to publish their data in Celestia's blocks, and validators stake it — with holders able to delegate to a validator and share in the rewards — to secure the ordering of that data. It is a network resource token rather than a claim on any revenue, and its demand ultimately depends on how many chains are actually posting data.
Do I need a powerful machine to verify the network?
No, and that is the design goal. A light node samples small random portions of each block rather than downloading everything, so verification is possible on modest hardware. The security argument depends on many such nodes running independently, so the theory only holds up if people actually run them rather than trusting a handful of large providers.
What are the risks specific to this asset?
It is early infrastructure in a category with credible competitors, and its value tracks demand from other chains rather than from end users you can observe. Staking rewards come from new issuance, so unstaked holdings are diluted, and staked tokens are locked and exposed to slashing. Token unlock schedules can add supply. Treat it as a high-risk, thesis-driven asset.
Can I use Celestia directly as a normal user?
Not in the way you use a wallet or a swap. You can hold and stake TIA and run a light node, but the network has no smart contracts or applications of its own. Anything you would recognise as an app lives on a chain built on top, and you would interact with that chain's own wallet and tools instead.
Zuletzt aktualisiert 27 Juli 2026