This blog by the brilliant Dr. Aud Jpy is a great resource for anyone interested in the history of statistics and the theory behind them. Dr. Jpy is an associate professor at the University of Toronto and has written two books, one entitled “The Art of Data Visualization” and another called “The Art and Science of Data Analysis.
There are a few interesting stats and charts in the blog, but one of the best is this one from the book. In the book, Dr. Jpy talks about the mathematical principles behind the data visualization. The problem with statistics is that most of them are abstract and difficult to understand. Dr. Jpy’s book is a little bit more accessible, but still a great read.
The problem is these abstract statistics are so difficult to understand that we can’t even really quantify the effect of statistics on society. I have written about this a few times, and most of the time I get that the data is just meaningless. But that doesn’t mean that it is. In fact, I think we’ve become so used to measuring everything using statistics that we don’t even realize we are measuring it.
And this is where the problem is most pronounced. The data that we use to understand society is the data that we use to measure ourselves. We use this data to make informed decisions. By measuring the data of our society, we are making decisions that are based on our culture. The problem is that the data is very often wrong. When you measure our society, you are measuring ourselves.
The reason we have the data we do is because our society is so flawed. There are so many ways to measure “progress”, but there are just as many ways to measure “failure”. The problem is that people don’t always realize we are measuring them. Take our culture for example, we live in a society where we have more money and more stuff than ever before, but we still have as many problems as ever.
The real problem lies somewhere in the middle. We can’t tell which of our houses is the one that gives the most money, and what we do with that money to, and it’s just something that needs to be measured. We can’t measure success, but we have to measure success. We can’t have things like a house that is more valuable than a house that is less valuable.
Now that we have the same house in all our houses, we can see how it came to be. And we can see how we went from a house that was more valuable to a house that is less valuable. This is just a graph.
We can also see that, over time, the value of a house goes up. We can also see that if the value of the house goes down, so does the value of the house.
It’s interesting that if we look at the average house, the value of the house goes up. But if the house has a new coat of paint, the value of the house goes down. The same house that has a new coat of paint, the value of the house doesn’t go down, so it doesn’t matter what the house looks like.
This is really good stuff and I love the fact that the developers are using data. I also love the fact that they are using real historical data. If you look at the graph, it’s nice to see the relationship between the values of different types of houses. If you look at the graph, it’s also nice to see that the value of the house goes up as you go down the lines.
